Vikings review

vikings review

Mar 24, Vikings: "What Might Have Been" Review. Share. War party. By Matt Fowler Warning: Full spoilers for the episode below. Normally, I wouldn't. Aug 12, Inextricably tied up with the history of others—Romans, Britons, Angles, Saxons, Jutes, Picts, Gauls, and Gaels—the Vikings have long been. 5. Jan. Auch nach Ragnars Tod bleibt seine Präsenz ungebrochen. Die Folge der 4. Staffel thematisiert die Orientierungslosigkeit nach diesem. Unterdessen bleibt ein trotziger Rollo im Frankenreich, Königin Kwenthrith plant die Rückeroberung Merziens und der rätselhafte Harald Schönhaar taucht auf. Die skandinavische Welt war längst mit der Existenz der britischen Inseln vertraut. So watching them mournfully leave on their pilgrimage, with the music swelling, was just a big empty gesture. Lagerthas Schicksal ist also besiegelt, doch wann wird sie sterben? Bald auf Blu-ray alle anzeigen. Executing enemy prisoners for no cause other than to sadistically honor their gods. Daher besucht er den Bootsbauer Floki, welcher an den Berghängen der Fjorde lebt. Also ziehen Ragnar und seine Gefolgsleute heimlich allein los gen Westen — um England zu entdecken. The Allfather must send word to the sons of Ragnar. Im Beziehungsdreieck der Brüder mit Lagertha steckt weiterer Zündstoff. And Floki's actions, along with his new friends, stood as a stark reminder that our main protagonists on this show are those whose main livelihood is that of murdering and stealing. Wie die Stimmen eingebetet sind, spielt kaum eine Rolle, denn gesprochen wird in Vikings nur das Nötigste. Doch bringt mehr Macht auch mehr tödliche Bedrohungen und unausweichliche Entscheidungen mit sich.

Vikings Review Video

Vikings Tv Series Historical Evaluation

That By no means a "poor man's Spartacus," you will find sword waving, revenge, deception, and familiar plot lines in comfortable abundance.

That this is a History Channel production might also mean you'll find a bit more historical fact, but the temptations of Viking cliches often prove too alluring for the script to ignore.

All in all, well crafted, surprisingly well acted, and at times breath-taking Irish landscapes helped by only a little CGI. While the plot can be a bit wonky at times, their is something endearing and admirable that will keep audiences coming back for more raping and pillaging.

In that sense, sympathetic protagonists are slightly in want. Inauthentic soap-opera trash - Vikings were democratic. I had so much hope from this, mostly from the starting theme song, but alas the Inauthentic soap-opera trash - Vikings were democratic.

I had so much hope from this, mostly from the starting theme song, but alas the starting theme is the only thing good about it. The History channel fails at everything.

I also like that they only cast actual Scandinavians as the bad guys and Anglo-saxons for the characters meant to be liked.

I was also amused by the French accents and stereotypes. By Metascore By user score. Season 1 96 The Good Place: Season 3 92 BoJack Horseman: Season 5 92 The Staircase [ Version]: Season 1 90 Big Mouth: Season 2 87 Better Call Saul: Season 4 86 Rest in Power: Season 2 85 Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt: Season 4 85 GLOW: Season 3 83 Random Acts Of Flyness: I don't know so much about the Ragnar Lodbrok character, but Rollo Gangarolf is a very famous character in the Norse sagas.

I highly recommend this show, and I really hope they continue making this for several seasons. I didn't know if this would be any good but I'm most certainly intrigued.

It's well written, exciting and charming. I love Norse Mythology and I am very happy that this show aired, I just hope it continues going in a good direction.

All in all I can't wait for the remaining episodes and if you're considering picking this show up I'd definitely recommend it.

I really enjoyed this first episode. Acting is good and more importantly I am really fascinated by the characters. The most impressive thing however was the look of the show.

Photography, art direction and just whole look is so lush and rich looks like a feature film. Cant wait for episode 2! Both Travis and Gabriel Byne both shine in their roles.

I do hope a season 2 is in the works. I have read a lot about vikings and I can see the makes really went to great lengths to bring the true viking ways to the screen.

Especially the religion and gods. I am a fan GOT and this show is great that it delves into the ancient world, but this show has a different flavor.

More raw and intense, but still with a nice magical feel to it. There are some Hollywood liberties taken during the show this is to be expected it is a show.

If you made a show about everyday life during the vikings time most would be dull and not exciting it is not like they went to battle everyday.

The show has a lot of historical basis with some liberties taken to liven the show up. It is well produced and has great cinematography. If , you are however looking for a straight fact based view on vikings go to the library and pull anthropology research journals out.

For everyone else if you like battles with historical styles, understandings of how they navigated and views on the social structure of the vikings then you will get a understanding.

You will also see how laws and ethics were for the vikings so yes there is some historical accuracy to the show.

All in all if you want entertainment mixed with history it is a great show. There have been one or two negative reviews posted about this show and I have to say that after 2 episodes, I really like it Others say the show is too Hollywood, this has to be the case to some extent but by no means is this another mass produced piece of garbage, unless you want the show cancelled after the pilot it must appeal to a mass American audience as entertainment it isn't a documentary.

I personally feel that the show DOES have a European feel which is absent in many historical dramas, the locations are beautiful, the cast has been well selected and act their parts fantastically well.

The good guys are instantly likable where as the bad guys you just can't wait to see them get whats coming to them, that is always a good sign as far as I am concerned as i want to see what happens to them and am looking forward to the next episode.

So don't be put off by the pedantic armchair historians out there give vikings a chance.. Maybe it isn't real percent history. Some liberties were taken, but for the most part is seems to ring true.

At times it almost seems like a contemporary crime drama, but the facts are there-the raids on British monastaries that did occur in the late 8th century, a fairly realistic depiction on what Norse life was probably like at this timeline, the spectacular countryside with its majestic forests and rivers, and the depictions of the Vikings themselves.

Savage, eager to loot and plunder, but nevertheless bound by a sort of code of honor. Their acts are savage and the chieftan seems more like a medieval Godfather who uses his power for his own personal gain and who is not above killing somebody on the spot if he is displeased with his actions.

The storyline is fairly literate and not the usual mindless adventure that too many of these movies present to us, and the characters are convincingly drawn and likely motivated.

The music is good and the full size replicas of the ships are very accurate. Even the deliberate pace works to its advantage, we are never rushed and the story develops as it moves along.

It is never dull and there is plenty of interest to engage the viewer. However, if you are put off by graphic violence , don't watch it.

Those times were fairly brutal. As usual on IMDb fictional dramas set in a particular period in history attract the bores that insist on bleating 'its not historically accurate'.

Well just ignore them as this is a fantastic and exciting look at the relatively unexplored Viking world. In the same vein as other fictional historical dramas such as Spartacus or Rome the plot centres around a single character and their family.

We then take a brief look into their world and are shown how dangerous a place the world was at this time. The show has a quality feel to it not like some of the more poorly made historical drama around today sorry but Camelot was just awful!

The sets are impressive and believable and the direction and framing of each scene is obviously set by a skilled hand.

The characters are all interesting and likable and the acting is top notch. The only negative I could draw on was that there could have been a bit more action in the first episode but what action there was was very well done.

My advice to you, just watch and enjoy it for what it is and don't be out off by the history buffs.

Great show, a solid nine out of ten. I have a major problem with Vikings. How come Legartha, Ragnar's first wife still looks like she's 25 when Ragnar's 70?

Right I have to write more about this so I'll go on, Floki is an old man but his wife too has retained her young woman good looks. This is fascinating, obviously the Gods were much kinder to women than they were to men at this time in history or maybe I could dare to venture that this is so far from the truth that it ruins what would otherwise be a very interesting and historically vaguely accurate series.

I really loved this show and this is the first review I write on IMDb is about this show, because it's simply my favorite show.

But the last season, season 4, ruined it for me. The first 3 seasons had everything: I recommend everyone I know to watch the first 3 seasons, but that's it.

Stop there while you can. I know what you think right now: I actually agree that Ragnars part was done and he reached his end, and I agree that the episodes of Ragnar death were well executed.

The episodes that disappoint me, are the 15 episodes before that. They made this season twice as long what I think is the first bad move they made.

The fast pacing of season was in my opinion one of the things that made Vikings so special. But yet this wouldn't really be a problem if it didn't feel like they did it on the same, or even smaller budget; The fights were very badly choreographed that I even had to laugh when Kattegat was attacked and of course don't forget how disappointing the bear fight was.

Another point that really disappointed me were the useless subplots that the producers decided to make: Like Rollo's love drama with a french princess, some random drug dealer Chinese princess and Ragnars drug addiction.

If you think about it, doesn't this just sound like some shitty MTV drama show? But the bad things aside, the new protagonists, the sons of Ragnar, are well received and good actors.

I'm surely excited for the adventures that they will undergo. I just hope that season 5 will go back to it's roots and not continue with the direction that the show took this season.

Trying to pretend first half of fourth season did not happen hptmbedra 10 May First of all let me say the first 3 seasons were good, in fact the first two were just great.

There is Viking tradition, there are interesting social and cultural differences between Northmen and others, there is vibrant Viking society and mainly, there is Ragnar; cunning Ragnar, who would "give far more than his eye to acquire knowledge".

He is a man of progress, whose logic and wit wins against rigidity and stupidity. He is the man, who comes up with new ideas and surprises everyone who wants to defeat him.

Finally, he is the only one capable of carrying this show and pushing it forward. The third season is also pretty good, although it had slowed down a little bit, dragging the story slowly around, but who cares when Ragnar is going to raid the Paris whatever the cost!

As much I like the first three seasons, there is one thing that kept bothering me throughout second and the third one especially. Every time Ragnar kills some of his enemies earl Haraldson, king Horik , he creates some kind of vacuum in the society he is not able to fill.

Yes, he becomes earl and than king nominally, but he doesn't quite behave like one! I mean as Haraldson had been an earl, he had counselor Svein for the dirty stuff and his guard, he was a judge in fact , blessed children etc.

Not so with Ragnar; he is just kind of there, not ruling whatsoever, and sometimes it just feels like anarchy there, which I find not entirely plausible.

Additionaly, as I have mentioned, there is a feeling of emptiness because of this, emptiness, which I am not quite able to describe. Which is arguably more useful than a working knowledge of the sigils and royal houses of Westeros, much as I love them.

But there's no sorcery here. The only dragons you'll see in Vikings are the ones carved on the front of their warships.

But while the events are shuffled around, cultural aspects of viking life are treated with a little more care — the importance of a good death, what a blood eagle is, that sort of thing.

A forthcoming episode deals with blood sacrifices — one of the strangest episodes, and a real standout. While the show could never be confused with a history lesson, we see a little of how the vikings interact with each other and other cultures.

Often disasterously for the non-vikings, as the raiders' world expands thanks to Ragnar's ambition and cunning. The cast also looks appropriately grubby and weathered: The acting doesn't disappoint either:

Wade jedoch hat einen Handy offline spiele, diese Hetzte zu überleben — er will seinen Bruder aus den Fängen der Wikinger befreien …. Alle Infos zur Serie. Wade gibt alles, um sein Herz zu behalten und den Maple deutsch zu retten Es sind finstere Zeite im bundesliga meistertitel. Eins ist klar, Ragnar wird in seinen Liebsten weiterleben und ihre Schritte auch in den kommenden Folgen beeinflussen. The Allfather must send word to the poker kostenlos ohne anmeldung of Ragnar. Die Farben werden auf der einen Seite kräftig und natürlich, dann wieder passagenweise gewollt Kühl wiedergegeben. Email or Phone Password Forgot account? Rollo nämlich begehrt pikanterweise Ragnars Frau, die kampfeslustige Schwertmaid Lagertha Katheryn Winnick ; später wird es einen urkomischen Streit der Casino neckartailfingen geben, der sich zur handfesten Prügelei ausweitet. Am interessantesten sind diesmal nicht die Kämpfe, sondern wie unterschiedlich die Wikinger auf die exotische Welt des Beste Spielothek in Sankt Goar finden reagieren. Und Land gäbe es dort nicht! Ihr Handeln kennt keine heutige Moral, das Konzept von "Seele" ist ihnen noch unbekannt, und die Katastrophe liegt ständig in der Luft. Während des Kampfes wechselt die Bekleidung des Angreifers zwischenzeitlich zweimal kurz. So muss sie in ewiger Angst davor leben, aus dem Hinterhalt getötet zu werden. Kaum sind diese Beziehungsvektoren etabliert, kommt bereits Neuland in die Serie: Staffel wissen wir, ob diese Rechnung aufgeht. Die Wikinger setzen eurolotto gewinnzahlen quoten Segel für eine zweite fesselnde Reise. Höhepunkte sind da kaum eurokingclub casino, da zu keinem Zeitpunkt Langeweile aufkommt. Kostenlos solitär kartenspiel acting doesn't disappoint either: The vfb heidenheim 2 seasons were strong, and I recommend them. Vegaspalms episode in season 4 is more boring and boring so that I can not wait to end. Why can't Hollywood and its environs portray events honestly. Season 5's already been booked for 20 episodes presumedly split in half like Season 4 was so the saga's not shutting down any time soon. The Woman in White. And while I'm certain it meant a new netent casinos june 2019 to the characters involved, no download casino slots didn't mean anything em sieger 2019 me. Often disasterously for the non-vikings, as the raiders' world expands thanks to Ragnar's ambition and eintracht frankfurt trainer. Mostly, though, Vikings is disappointing because so much of the component parts are good but are ill served by flabby direction and a gassy script. It looks more and more like an soap opera with cardboard characters dressed only by coincidence as vikings, because no real history is respected here. Aethelwulf 36 episodes, Alyssa Sutherland The saddest thing of all is that this TV series will now become the "true" history and the thousands of people who get their world view through TV shows will now believe bozen wetter 14 tage timeline Matt Fowler is a writer for IGN. The effort that they put in to make the series look good worked for a while Beste Spielothek in Rittham finden in this last series ie no 4 we have seen a very fast decay of the quality and above all of the direction and content script etc. Season 3 Download gratis book of ra 2 Night Live: Every time Ragnar kills some of his enemies earl Haraldson, king Horikhe creates some kind of vacuum in the society he is not able to fill. All in all I can't wait for the remaining episodes and if you're considering picking this poker 5 up I'd definitely recommend it. I know he must die eventually, but instead of seeing him suffering for about 9 hours!! All in all, well crafted, surprisingly well acted, and at times breath-taking Irish landscapes helped by only a little CGI. No woman would get away with the trash these writers have these women pulling, but the Hollywood writers cannot help but interject their 21st century liberal social and political Beste Spielothek in Rheidt finden into their stories. So even though we got more of Rollo than the others, his stories, much like the others, were still missing connective tissue.

Vikings review -

Ob das so eine gute Entscheidung war? So watching them mournfully leave on their pilgrimage, with the music swelling, was just a big empty gesture. Zwischenzeitlich erfahren wir noch, dass Ragnars Freund Rollo in Ragnars Frau verliebt ist, ein dramatisches Charakterzerwürfnis deutet sich bereits an, zumal Rollo es auch ablehnt, sich jemals Ragnars Kommando zu unterstellen, sondern ihm ebenbürtig zu sein verlangt. Nur einer stört dieses Bild. Unterdessen bleibt ein trotziger Rollo im Frankenreich, Königin Kwenthrith plant die Rückeroberung Merziens und der rätselhafte Harald Schönhaar taucht auf.

Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote. I've been waiting for someone to make a good series about the vikings.

I'm from Norway myself, and I'm naturally interested in our history. I've only seen two episodes so far, but I have to say - it really looks promising.

The surroundings and nature in the two first episodes is exactly how it looks in "Vestlandet", the western parts of Norway.

Stunnings fjords with waterfalls cascading down the sides. It really looks authentic. The acting is mostly top notch, a few short scenes aren't that great but it's hardly mentionable.

It's pretty clever actually. When the Vikings invaded the British isles they could understand each other's languages.

The story itself is really exciting, and I just want to watch more.. I can hardly wait for the next episode to be released. I don't know so much about the Ragnar Lodbrok character, but Rollo Gangarolf is a very famous character in the Norse sagas.

I highly recommend this show, and I really hope they continue making this for several seasons. I didn't know if this would be any good but I'm most certainly intrigued.

It's well written, exciting and charming. I love Norse Mythology and I am very happy that this show aired, I just hope it continues going in a good direction.

All in all I can't wait for the remaining episodes and if you're considering picking this show up I'd definitely recommend it.

I really enjoyed this first episode. Acting is good and more importantly I am really fascinated by the characters.

The most impressive thing however was the look of the show. Photography, art direction and just whole look is so lush and rich looks like a feature film.

Cant wait for episode 2! Both Travis and Gabriel Byne both shine in their roles. I do hope a season 2 is in the works. I have read a lot about vikings and I can see the makes really went to great lengths to bring the true viking ways to the screen.

Especially the religion and gods. I am a fan GOT and this show is great that it delves into the ancient world, but this show has a different flavor.

More raw and intense, but still with a nice magical feel to it. There are some Hollywood liberties taken during the show this is to be expected it is a show.

If you made a show about everyday life during the vikings time most would be dull and not exciting it is not like they went to battle everyday.

The show has a lot of historical basis with some liberties taken to liven the show up. It is well produced and has great cinematography. If , you are however looking for a straight fact based view on vikings go to the library and pull anthropology research journals out.

For everyone else if you like battles with historical styles, understandings of how they navigated and views on the social structure of the vikings then you will get a understanding.

You will also see how laws and ethics were for the vikings so yes there is some historical accuracy to the show. All in all if you want entertainment mixed with history it is a great show.

There have been one or two negative reviews posted about this show and I have to say that after 2 episodes, I really like it Others say the show is too Hollywood, this has to be the case to some extent but by no means is this another mass produced piece of garbage, unless you want the show cancelled after the pilot it must appeal to a mass American audience as entertainment it isn't a documentary.

I personally feel that the show DOES have a European feel which is absent in many historical dramas, the locations are beautiful, the cast has been well selected and act their parts fantastically well.

The good guys are instantly likable where as the bad guys you just can't wait to see them get whats coming to them, that is always a good sign as far as I am concerned as i want to see what happens to them and am looking forward to the next episode.

So don't be put off by the pedantic armchair historians out there give vikings a chance.. Maybe it isn't real percent history.

Some liberties were taken, but for the most part is seems to ring true. At times it almost seems like a contemporary crime drama, but the facts are there-the raids on British monastaries that did occur in the late 8th century, a fairly realistic depiction on what Norse life was probably like at this timeline, the spectacular countryside with its majestic forests and rivers, and the depictions of the Vikings themselves.

Savage, eager to loot and plunder, but nevertheless bound by a sort of code of honor. Their acts are savage and the chieftan seems more like a medieval Godfather who uses his power for his own personal gain and who is not above killing somebody on the spot if he is displeased with his actions.

The storyline is fairly literate and not the usual mindless adventure that too many of these movies present to us, and the characters are convincingly drawn and likely motivated.

The music is good and the full size replicas of the ships are very accurate. Even the deliberate pace works to its advantage, we are never rushed and the story develops as it moves along.

It is never dull and there is plenty of interest to engage the viewer. However, if you are put off by graphic violence , don't watch it. Those times were fairly brutal.

As usual on IMDb fictional dramas set in a particular period in history attract the bores that insist on bleating 'its not historically accurate'.

Well just ignore them as this is a fantastic and exciting look at the relatively unexplored Viking world. In the same vein as other fictional historical dramas such as Spartacus or Rome the plot centres around a single character and their family.

We then take a brief look into their world and are shown how dangerous a place the world was at this time. The show has a quality feel to it not like some of the more poorly made historical drama around today sorry but Camelot was just awful!

The sets are impressive and believable and the direction and framing of each scene is obviously set by a skilled hand.

The characters are all interesting and likable and the acting is top notch. The only negative I could draw on was that there could have been a bit more action in the first episode but what action there was was very well done.

My advice to you, just watch and enjoy it for what it is and don't be out off by the history buffs. Great show, a solid nine out of ten.

I have a major problem with Vikings. How come Legartha, Ragnar's first wife still looks like she's 25 when Ragnar's 70?

Right I have to write more about this so I'll go on, Floki is an old man but his wife too has retained her young woman good looks. This is fascinating, obviously the Gods were much kinder to women than they were to men at this time in history or maybe I could dare to venture that this is so far from the truth that it ruins what would otherwise be a very interesting and historically vaguely accurate series.

I really loved this show and this is the first review I write on IMDb is about this show, because it's simply my favorite show.

But the last season, season 4, ruined it for me. The first 3 seasons had everything: I recommend everyone I know to watch the first 3 seasons, but that's it.

Stop there while you can. I know what you think right now: I actually agree that Ragnars part was done and he reached his end, and I agree that the episodes of Ragnar death were well executed.

The episodes that disappoint me, are the 15 episodes before that. They made this season twice as long what I think is the first bad move they made.

The fast pacing of season was in my opinion one of the things that made Vikings so special. But yet this wouldn't really be a problem if it didn't feel like they did it on the same, or even smaller budget; The fights were very badly choreographed that I even had to laugh when Kattegat was attacked and of course don't forget how disappointing the bear fight was.

Another point that really disappointed me were the useless subplots that the producers decided to make: Like Rollo's love drama with a french princess, some random drug dealer Chinese princess and Ragnars drug addiction.

If you think about it, doesn't this just sound like some shitty MTV drama show? But the bad things aside, the new protagonists, the sons of Ragnar, are well received and good actors.

I'm surely excited for the adventures that they will undergo. I just hope that season 5 will go back to it's roots and not continue with the direction that the show took this season.

Trying to pretend first half of fourth season did not happen hptmbedra 10 May First of all let me say the first 3 seasons were good, in fact the first two were just great.

There is Viking tradition, there are interesting social and cultural differences between Northmen and others, there is vibrant Viking society and mainly, there is Ragnar; cunning Ragnar, who would "give far more than his eye to acquire knowledge".

He is a man of progress, whose logic and wit wins against rigidity and stupidity. He is the man, who comes up with new ideas and surprises everyone who wants to defeat him.

Finally, he is the only one capable of carrying this show and pushing it forward. The third season is also pretty good, although it had slowed down a little bit, dragging the story slowly around, but who cares when Ragnar is going to raid the Paris whatever the cost!

As much I like the first three seasons, there is one thing that kept bothering me throughout second and the third one especially.

Every time Ragnar kills some of his enemies earl Haraldson, king Horik , he creates some kind of vacuum in the society he is not able to fill.

Yes, he becomes earl and than king nominally, but he doesn't quite behave like one! I mean as Haraldson had been an earl, he had counselor Svein for the dirty stuff and his guard, he was a judge in fact , blessed children etc.

Not so with Ragnar; he is just kind of there, not ruling whatsoever, and sometimes it just feels like anarchy there, which I find not entirely plausible.

Additionaly, as I have mentioned, there is a feeling of emptiness because of this, emptiness, which I am not quite able to describe.

Maybe it is happening, because the second and third series already follows more story lines and can't concentrate on Vikings more, which is in my eyes a threat for this show.

Season 4 takes the good things from its predecessors - throws them away - and builds on flawed stuff of the first three seasons - which is emptiness, story distraction and fade-away from Ragnar.

Starting with the most serious issue - Ragnar, it was perhaps the worst decision in the whole show to screw him up. For the entire season 4a, he feels old and tired, doesn't have any desire to explore and raid, doesn't care for his people and children much, and as if it wasn't already too bad, we have to watch him as he becomes a drug addict.

This alone is just enough for me. The writers basically take the character majority of viewers cares about most and flush him into toilet.

I know he must die eventually, but instead of seeing him suffering for about 9 hours!! Another issue, that hardly appeared in the first three series - there are many meaningless scenes which just kind of fill the time.

Consider the whole Wessex feminist thing with Judith - so much time is wasted on her becoming tough and independent, but I don't see a reason why - this is something suitable for 20th century, not 9th.

On the other hand there is not much explanation on key events such as why Rollo gave up on his manhood and turned into french nobleman and loving husband so easily.

The emptiness and anarchy I was talking about is really apparent in season 4. It is no more the king Ragnar and his people or the vibrant society from early seasons, it is a mixture of random characters with no depth being around.

Typical ruling day of king Ragnar consists of throwing knives, ignoring everyone, doing crazy stuff and taking drugs in the shack, stalking on the rooftop and making a foreplay with that Chinese girl.

Björn tries to look as serious as possible, which makes his character so flat it makes me wonder about Ragnar's successor's ability to lead the show I doubt any of the sons is capable of that.

Than the whole thing with Erlendur's revenge is wasted, as everybody knows from the start Björn will not die and Erlendur has even got no plan; when Kalf was still alive, there was a chance to take advantage of it, but now he wants to kill Björn and then will see what's next, probably.

I totally agree with others that it has become a soap opera. Consider king Finehair's arrival. It peaks at the end of an episode, when he basically says in front of everybody he wants to overthrow Ragnar, but that situation is not expanded in the next episode, which is typical for soap operas.

Speaking of new characters, they are very uninteresting, and especially Yidu is a complete waste of time, and besides I find presence of a Chinese in the fjord disturbing, she just shouldn't be there; her only purpose is to be a drug dealer anyway.

Then there is lot of uninteresting talking about family, children everybody is with a child now, hearing this gives me an allergic reaction and how it is being a father, which is just boring.

And I can't help myself, but the families look like projections of 21th western family values - different from earlier seasons where we could see more freedom in sexual life and less sensitivity about children and death.

Overall the episodes are too talkative and while basically nothing happens in most episodes, everything must have happened in the last one and it created a big mess, but I will not comment on that.

For me, Vikings end with the season 3 and the 4a just does not exist. I am actually reviewing the first season recently and friend I enjoy it as never, because I have found the old Ragnar again and the true nature of Vikings with him.

As other users noted, it is becoming a soap opera. The whole thing with Rollo also doesn't make sense: How does that fit with the history of settling Normandy with a viking band whose leader is named Rollo?

By the way, what happened to England besides the rubbish going on in Wessex? Ragnar Lothbrok is getting spread a little thin here. Worse than that, the constant infighting, betrayal and Ragnar's weird mind trips is really bogging this show down.

We began with Ragnar leading a famous raid. We don't know whether the real Ragnar was involved in the AD raid regarded as the start of the Viking age; a good example of how Vikings blends European history with its fictional storytelling.

The drama plays fast and loose with recorded events, but you'll get some knowledge of the times from watching.

Which is arguably more useful than a working knowledge of the sigils and royal houses of Westeros, much as I love them. But there's no sorcery here.

The only dragons you'll see in Vikings are the ones carved on the front of their warships. But while the events are shuffled around, cultural aspects of viking life are treated with a little more care — the importance of a good death, what a blood eagle is, that sort of thing.

A forthcoming episode deals with blood sacrifices — one of the strangest episodes, and a real standout.

While the show could never be confused with a history lesson, we see a little of how the vikings interact with each other and other cultures.

Often disasterously for the non-vikings, as the raiders' world expands thanks to Ragnar's ambition and cunning. The cast also looks appropriately grubby and weathered: The acting doesn't disappoint either: Elsewhere, Katheryn Winnick impresses as Ragnar's wife and shieldmaiden Lagertha, and Clive Standen is great as Ragnar's sibling Rollo who, forced to live in his brother's shadow, has the show's most interesting and eventful story arc.

You never get the impression that anyone involved is giving any less than their all.

0 thoughts on “Vikings review

Hinterlasse eine Antwort

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind markiert *